Thank you for participating! The sorting test you just took is called the Questionnaire-Based Implicit Association Test (qIAT). You categorized 'False' and 'True' statements with statements related to 'Type 1' persons and 'Type 2' persons. <%=typePairing%>
Here is your result:Disclaimer:
These results are not a definitive assessment of your implicit association. The results may be influenced by variables related to the test (e.g., the category labels or particular items used to represent the categories on the qIAT) or the person (e.g., how tired you are). The results are provided for educational purposes only.How Does The qIAT Work?
The qIAT measures the strength of associations between concepts (e.g., Being like a Type 1 person, being like a Type 2 person) and attributes (e.g., False, True). The main idea is that making a response is easier when closely related items share the same response key. We would say that one associated implicity with 'Type 1' relative to 'Type 2' if they are faster to categorize statements when 'Type 1' and 'True' share a response key relative to when 'Type 2' and 'True' share a response key. Any single qIAT is unlikely to predict behavior well for a specific individual, or be a very precise assessment of their personality traits.
What Was This Study About?
In this study you took a questionnaire and an implicit task, presumably assessing the same personality trait, <%=capTrait%>. This study aims to test the qIAT's ability to reliably assess personality traits. We focus specifically on <%=trait%>, as previous research showed people's implicit assessment of their <%=trait%> varies greatly from their self-reported accounts. We hope to better understand this variation, and improve the methods currently being used to assess personality traits.
Does The Order In Which I Took The qIAT Matter?
We don't know. But, because the qIAT is a variation of the Implicit Association task (IAT), and because we do know the order in which people take the IAT can influence their IAT score, we think it is likely.
However, the order effect in the IAT is very small.
So if you first pair 'Type 1' + 'False' / 'Type 2' + 'True' and then pair 'Type 1' + 'True' / 'Type 2' + 'False', your results might be just a tiny bit different than they would be if you had done the reverse pairing first.
To minimize the order effect in the qIAT, we give more practice trials before the second pairing than we did before the first pairing. We also randomly assign participants to one of the two possible orderings, so half of the test-takers complete 'Type 1' + 'False' / 'Type 2' + 'True' and then 'Type 1' + 'True' / 'Type 2' + 'False', and the other half get the opposite order.
Additionally, we randomly assign participants to one of two possible meanings of 'Type 1' and 'Type 2', so half of the test-takers complete the task with what you saw as 'Type 1' being referred as 'Type 2', and vice-versa.
I Still Have Questions About The Study.
If you have questions about the IAT, on which the qIAT task is based upon, please check out our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). If you have any questions or comments about the study, please email the lead investigator Michael Pinus (pinusm@post.bgu.ac.il).
Your Participation And Financial Support Are Important!
Thank you again for participating in this research! We have learned so much from people like you taking the time to be part of our work. If you have time, please consider taking another test by clicking the button below.
As a non-profit organization, we would also appreciate your financial support. Since establishment in 2005, we have educated more than a million visitors each year about implicit biases concerning race, gender, sexual orientation, and other topics. Your donation supports Project Implicit's educational, scientific, and public service missions.